The history of doping in sports dates back to ancient times, with athletes using various substances to enhance performance. The evolution of performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) has led to concerns about gene therapy and gene editing, which are difficult to detect through traditional testing methods. The use of technology in sports, known as “techno-doping,” raises questions about fairness and the integrity of competition.
Proponents of allowing PEDs argue that they can help athletes recover from injuries and improve performance, while also advocating for the regulation and safe use of these drugs. They believe that athletes should have the autonomy to make decisions about their bodies and that banning PEDs treats them like children. The focus should be on health and fitness to compete, rather than solely on drug testing.
Opponents of PEDs argue that they violate the spirit and integrity of sport, altering the nature of competition by emphasizing physical attributes over other skills. They highlight the dangers of PEDs, including long-term health risks and unfair competitive advantages. Allowing PEDs could also lead to increased youth drug use and other unhealthy behaviors, as athletes serve as role models for young people.
