spot_img
Saturday, May 10, 2025
HomeHorse Law NewsTitle: New York Officials Negotiate $5 Million Tax Break for Racetracks Amid...

Title: New York Officials Negotiate $5 Million Tax Break for Racetracks Amid Budget Discussions

Top New York officials are negotiating a $5 million tax break for racetracks across the state as part of a massive spending plan that appears to be having its final touches put together in Albany.

The plan being pushed by the New York Racing Association would raise the pari-mutuel tax rate on advance deposit wagering operators and lower the rate on Thoroughbred and Standardbred racetracks.

The proposal is a change from what New York Gov. Kathy Hochul proposed in January, which was, in essence, a revenue-neutral set of alterations to the complex pari-mutuel tax laws.

Negotiators for Hochul and the Legislature are still putting the final pieces together on a new budget for the state, which was due on April 1 when the fiscal year began. Until all the various budget bills emerge and get voted on, the pari-mutuel proposed language could still change.

The final budget, as previously reported, is expected to include language to round bettors’ winnings to the nearest penny for all horse race payouts now affected by the state’s breakage law.

As the BloodHorse reported in March, the final budget is also expected to set aside funding for equipping and operating a new advanced imaging screen program at the Cornell Ruffian Equine Specialists Hospital adjacent to Belmont Park.

Under the pari-mutuel tax proposal being discussed, out-of-state ADWs would pay a tax rate of 6.45% of handle, up from 5% currently. NYRA now pays 7.45% of handle to the state, which would drop by 0.54% under the new plan being negotiated behind closed doors at the state capitol. Sources said the numbers being discussed would still see ADWs paying a lower tax on handle than the 6.91% level for NYRA.

It is uncertain how much of the $5 million in tax breaks would benefit NYRA specifically compared to other track operators in the state. Officials with the heads of the Senate and Assembly racing and wagering committees did not comment Tuesday.

For NYRA, the uniform pari-mutuel tax rate would result in a savings of 0.54%. Even with this change, NYRA would still have an overall effective statutorily imposed rate of 6.91% of handle.

Backers of the proposal say the changes are needed.

"The proposed changes to New York State’s pari-mutuel taxes and fees will simplify the horse racing business and level the playing field between New York’s racetracks/ADW operators and their out-of-state competitors. NYRA commends Governor Hochul and the NYS Legislature for supporting a more consistent payment structure across the racing landscape, which will allow organizations like NYRA to maximize its investments in the sport and its stakeholders," NYRA spokesman Patrick McKenna said on May 6.

New York officials are negotiating a $5 million tax break for racetracks as part of a broader spending plan, with discussions centered around changes to the pari-mutuel tax structure. The proposal, advocated by the New York Racing Association (NYRA), aims to increase the tax rate for advance deposit wagering (ADW) operators while lowering it for Thoroughbred and Standardbred racetracks. This marks a shift from Governor Kathy Hochul’s earlier revenue-neutral proposal regarding the complex pari-mutuel tax laws.

As the state budget negotiations continue, expected changes include rounding bettors’ winnings to the nearest penny for horse race payouts and funding for a new advanced imaging screen program at the Cornell Ruffian Equine Specialists Hospital. Under the proposed tax structure, out-of-state ADWs would see an increase in their tax rate from 5% to 6.45%, while NYRA’s rate would decrease slightly from 7.45% to 6.91%.

Supporters of the tax changes argue that they will simplify the horse racing industry and create a more equitable environment for New York racetracks and ADW operators compared to their out-of-state counterparts. NYRA has expressed gratitude to Governor Hochul and the legislature for their support, emphasizing that a more consistent payment structure will enable them to better invest in the sport and its stakeholders.

Previous article

Title: Maryland Governor Wes Moore Signs 193 Bills into Law, Including Key Changes to School Funding

More than 190 pieces of legislation were signed into law by Maryland Gov. Wes Moore on Tuesday, including changes to the state’s school spending plan. During the 2025 legislative session, the governor proposed funding cuts to the Blueprint for Maryland’s Future, sparking concerns among education leaders and advocates. The blueprint plan was developed over three years with the goal of increasing spending for schools in impoverished areas and supporting students in underserved districts. The final plan, which became law in 2021, raises school spending to about $12,000 over several years.

The governor’s proposed changes included a pause on increased planning time for teachers and preventing funding increases for students in certain low-income school communities and English language learners. Gov. Moore initially proposed cuts to the blueprint plan as the state faced a $3 billion shortfall. The changes would have cut school spending by $1.6 billion over four years.

The House instead passed a version of the Excellence in Maryland Public Schools Act that rejected many of the governor’s proposed cuts. The Maryland Public Schools Act, which was signed Tuesday, allows funding increases in the blueprint plan for 2026, but the plan will only increase for inflation adjustment in 2027 and 2028. By 2029, funding for students would start increasing again by $334, and by 2035, funding would increase by $1,527.

In total, Gov. Moore signed 193 bills into law Tuesday, and many of them focus on education and improving school safety. Under House Bill 1475, the Maryland Department of Education is required to create a group to analyze the use of a publicly funded Pre-K program that was created under the Blueprint for Maryland’s Future. The group is required to submit a report with recommended changes by December 2027.

One of the bills, HB782, requires the Maryland Center for School Safety to conduct a study on how to best detect weapons in public middle and high schools and how to report those weapons to local law enforcement. The law requires an interim report about the study to be completed by December 2025 and a final report to be submitted by December 2026. Another bill, HB879, creates a task force that will study and recommend ways to improve student attendance and prevent chronic absenteeism. That task force will have to submit a report by December 2025.

Several of the bills signed into law Tuesday expand veterans’ resources to all service members. The Health Equality for Service Members act changes the definition of "veteran" to include all uniformed services when it comes to public health, housing vouchers, and other forms of assistance. The Recreational Equality for Service Members Act has similar implications for fishing licenses, and the Judicial and Public Safety for Service Members Act does the same in relation to criminal and family court proceedings.

Here are some of the other bills that were signed into law this week:

SB674 creates a group to study access to over-the-counter birth control and requires a final report to be submitted by December 2027. SB400 prevents transportation companies that take children to residential child care programs from using certain restraints or picking up children between 9 p.m. and 6 a.m. SB842 allows the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Cannabis Commission to seize electronic smoking devices like vapes that are sold in violation of certain laws. SB259 requires local boards of elections to share election plans at least seven months before a statewide primary election. The Pregnant and Parenting Student Support Act requires certain public higher education institutions to create plans for pregnant or parenting students that include referrals to on- or off-campus services that help with government assistance, scholarships, and other programs.

Next article

Title: "14 Bizarre American Laws Still on the Books: A Glimpse into Legal Oddities"


Legal systems evolve slowly by design, with new laws continually added while outdated ones often remain on the books indefinitely. This legislative inertia has created a fascinating legal landscape filled with antiquated regulations that nobody enforces yet technically remain valid.

These forgotten statutes reflect bygone concerns, outdated social norms, and sometimes simply bizarre local priorities that somehow escaped legal housecleaning efforts. Here is a list of 14 peculiar American laws that remain technically in effect despite their obsolescence in modern society.

Tying Alligators to Fire Hydrants

In Michigan, it remains illegal to tie an alligator to a fire hydrant. This law likely originated when traveling circuses and exotic animal shows were common attractions in small towns across America. Local officials worried about public safety and access to critical infrastructure created these regulations to prevent show operators from securing their animals to essential public utilities. Nobody has likely been charged under this statute in decades, yet Michigan lawmakers have never bothered to remove it from the legal code.

Ice Cream in Back Pockets

In Kentucky, carrying ice cream in your back pocket is against the law. This strange regulation stems from the 1800s when horse thieves used ice cream to lure horses away without technically stealing them. The thief would put ice cream in their pocket, and when a horse followed them home attracted by the sweet treat, they could claim the animal had followed them home of its own accord. The law remains on the books despite the dramatic decline in both horse-based transportation and pocket-based horse theft schemes.

Playing Dominoes on Sunday

In Alabama, playing dominoes on Sunday is technically illegal in some municipalities. These regulations fall under old ‘blue laws’ designed to enforce religious observance and prevent certain activities deemed inappropriate for the Sabbath. While modern courts would likely find such laws unconstitutional if enforced, many communities have simply left them in place rather than going through formal repeal processes. Similar restrictions on Sunday activities exist throughout the country, creating a patchwork of unenforced religious-based regulations.

Whaling Prohibitions in Oklahoma

Oklahoma law prohibits whaling within state borders. This landlocked state is approximately 500 miles from the nearest ocean, making whale hunting physically impossible rather than merely illegal. The law likely exists either as a humorous addition to the legal code or because Oklahoma simply adopted wholesale legal frameworks from coastal states without removing irrelevant sections. Either way, Oklahoma’s whale population can rest easy knowing they’re legally protected in the unlikely event they find themselves in the Sooner State.

Fortune-Telling Licenses

In New Orleans, professional fortune tellers must obtain licenses and pay fees to legally practice their craft. This regulation dates back to efforts to control what authorities considered potentially fraudulent activities while still accommodating the city’s unique cultural practices. Unlike many outdated laws, this one occasionally sees enforcement, particularly in tourist areas where unlicensed psychics set up shop. The regulation creates the curious situation where the government officially licenses people to predict the future, implicitly giving state sanction to supernatural claims.

Frowning in Public

In Pocatello, Idaho, a 1948 ordinance made it illegal to display a ‘dismal or depressed countenance’ in public. The ‘smile ordinance’ was originally passed as a humorous morale booster during a particularly harsh winter. Local police never actively enforced the regulation, but the city gained national attention in 1987 when the law was discovered by media outlets. Rather than repealing it, city officials turned it into a marketing opportunity, reaffirming Pocatello as the ‘U.S. Smile Capital’ and maintaining this quirky legal footnote for tourism purposes.

Flirting Fines

In New York City, a man can be fined $25 for ‘gazing suggestively’ at a female passerby. This regulation comes from early 20th-century efforts to combat street harassment and maintain public decorum. The subjective nature of determining what constitutes a ‘suggestive gaze’ makes this law practically unenforceable in modern times. Nevertheless, it persists in the city’s legal code alongside other outdated public conduct regulations that reflect changing social standards across generations.

No Selling Peanuts After Sundown

In Mobile, Alabama, selling peanuts after sundown is prohibited on certain streets. This obscure regulation likely originated from early 20th-century concerns about litter and public nuisance, as peanut shells were commonly discarded on streets and sidewalks. Nighttime visibility made the shells particularly hazardous to pedestrians in the era before widespread street lighting. Though modern street cleaning and lighting have rendered this concern obsolete, the law remains a curious relic of municipal micromanagement.

Mining with Dynamite on Sundays

A Nevada state law prohibits using dynamite while mining on Sundays. This regulation combines elements of blue laws with legitimate safety concerns from an era when mining dominated the state’s economy. With fewer mine inspectors available on Sundays, lawmakers likely saw the prohibition as a practical safety measure rather than a purely religious regulation. Modern mining operations follow comprehensive federal safety guidelines, making this state-level Sunday restriction redundant yet still technically enforceable.

No Playing Checkers in Public

In Fountain Inn, South Carolina, playing checkers in public remains against local ordinances. This law originated during segregation when authorities sought to prevent interracial socialization in public spaces. Checker games were popular gathering activities that brought people together across racial lines, prompting discriminatory regulations to prohibit them. While the discriminatory intent behind the law would make it unconstitutional today, the actual statute remains in municipal code, an uncomfortable reminder of the legal infrastructure of racial segregation.

Mispronouncing State Names

In Arkansas, mispronouncing the state name is technically a legal violation. The state legislature passed this tongue-in-cheek law in 1947 to address the common mispronunciation of ‘Ar-kansas’ instead of the correct ‘Arkansaw.’ The statute specifically approves only the latter pronunciation while making no provision for actual penalties. Despite being entirely unenforceable and likely unconstitutional under First Amendment protections, the law reflects regional pride in linguistic distinctiveness that lawmakers felt worth preserving in legal code.

Elephant Parking Meters

Cleveland, Ohio maintains a regulation requiring motorists who park elephants at parking meters to deposit an appropriate payment just as they would for automobiles. This peculiar law emerged during an era when traveling circuses regularly visited American cities and sometimes left performing animals in inconvenient locations. The statute applies standard parking regulations to unusual conveyances without creating separate rules, demonstrating an oddly practical approach to an improbable situation. The law remains despite the declining presence of elephants in urban transportation.

Sleeping in Cheese Factories

In South Dakota, falling asleep in a cheese factory violates state law. This regulation likely originated from genuine safety concerns about industrial accidents and sanitation in food production facilities. Workers who doze off near dangerous equipment or in sensitive production areas could cause serious problems. While modern food safety regulations and OSHA standards cover these concerns more comprehensively, the specific prohibition against cheese factory napping remains on the books as a curious artifact of early food safety legislation.

No Riding Horses After Dark

In Wilbur, Washington, riding a horse after dark requires tail lights and reflectors, treating equine transportation similarly to motorized vehicles. This law emerged during the transition period between horse-based and automobile transportation, attempting to apply consistent safety standards across different modes of travel. Similar horse lighting regulations exist in several states, creating the legally peculiar situation where animals must be equipped with technology designed for machines. These requirements persist despite the minimal presence of horse-based night transportation in contemporary America.

These forgotten laws reveal how legal systems accumulate cultural artifacts that reflect changing technologies, social values, and public concerns across generations. While technically enforceable, these regulations survive primarily as historical curiosities rather than active governance tools. The continued existence of these outdated statutes demonstrates how legal systems prioritize adding new laws over removing obsolete ones, creating a fascinating archaeological record embedded within active legal codes. Next time you carry ice cream in your pocket or frown in Idaho, remember you might be breaking laws nobody remembers but everyone technically must follow.

Shop Indoor Riding Arena Lighting

latest articles

explore more