Concerns have emerged regarding the application of the Consumer Rights Act in horse sales, particularly how it may disadvantage sellers. Equine lawyer Hannah Bradley highlighted that while the law aims to protect buyers, it can create challenges for professional sellers, as horses are classified as “goods” and must meet specific quality standards. The 30-day period for buyers to reject unsatisfactory horses can incentivize them to return horses without fully addressing settling-in issues, which may not reflect the horse’s true nature.
Traders like Shelley Barrington argue that the law’s timeframe is unrealistic for horses to adjust to new environments. Many issues reported within this period often stem from the horse’s adjustment or the buyer’s management skills rather than inherent problems with the horse. This can lead to mislabeling horses as “bad” or “dangerous,” damaging their reputations. Barrington emphasizes the importance of honest communication about the buyer’s experience and capabilities.
Experts, including Gemma Stanford from the British Horse Society, stress the need for thorough research and consideration when buying a horse. They recommend involving a coach during viewings, conducting pre-purchase examinations, and utilizing clear sale contracts to mitigate disputes. The principle of “buyer beware” remains crucial, and seeking professional legal advice is advised if issues arise post-purchase.
