spot_img
Thursday, May 8, 2025
HomeHorse Law NewsTitle: Historic Election: Robert Prevost Becomes the First American Pope in 2,000...

Title: Historic Election: Robert Prevost Becomes the First American Pope in 2,000 Years

For the first time in history, an American has been elected as Pope. The idea of an American pope has often been dismissed, even by theologians in the United States in the run-up to this week’s conclave. So few expected Robert Prevost to walk out onto the balcony at the Vatican as the new head of the Catholic Church.

And yet, on Thursday the Chicago-born cardinal-bishop, known by friends as “Bob,” made history after becoming the 267th pope – the first time in the Church’s 2,000-year history that an American has been appointed to lead it.

Prevost – who has joint Peruvian citizenship and spent years living and working in the South American country – has chosen to be known as Leo XIV. As Bishop of Chicago, the 69-year-old pontiff once oversaw the largest Archdiocese in North America.

Prior to his election, many observers had questioned him as a candidate due to his relatively young age and inexperience. Some speculated that cardinals would also wish to select a European, following 12 years of tenure by Pope Francis – an Argentinian – and considered it unlikely a pontiff would emerge from the U.S.

The Reverend James Bretzke, a theology professor at John Carroll University in Ohio, told USA Today this week that a diplomat was required to replace Pope Francis, adding: “America’s image in the world simply is too powerful − and to be blunt, ugly.”

Vatican insiders had described Prevost as a “dark horse” candidate who quietly rose to prominence in the days just before the conclave, having been made a cardinal-bishop in February this year. In terms of leading the Catholic Church, he has been described as a “dignified middle of the road” leader, compared with Francis, who was considered a progressive pontiff, and more conservative alternatives.

Significantly, he presided over one of the most revolutionary reforms Francis made, when he added three women to the voting bloc that decides which bishop nominations to forward to the pope.

However, Prevost has also expressed less progressive stances, including more negative views of the LGBT community. According to The New York Times, in an address to bishops in 2012, Prevost bemoaned the fact that western media fostered “sympathy for beliefs and practices that are at odds with the gospel,” pointing to the “homosexual lifestyle” and “alternative families comprised of same-sex partners and their adopted children.”

Prevost, who holds both American and Peruvian citizenship, previously served as prefect of the Vatican’s Dicastery for Bishops, which handles various administrative and pastoral responsibilities of the Holy See, including vetting nominations for bishops around the world.

Born in Chicago, Illinois, in 1955, Prevost grew up in the city’s south suburbs, where he lived in Dolton with his parents and two brothers. Reports claimed he was a fan of the Chicago Cubs baseball team. The record, however, was set straight on Thursday by his brother, who confirmed he had “always” been a White Sox fan.

Growing up, a steady stream of priests passed through his family home, and the youngster reportedly had a positive experience of parish life, serving as an altar boy and attending school in the St. Mary of the Assumption parish on the far South Side.

Prevost was sent to study canon law at the Angelicum in Rome and was ordained as a priest in the city in 1982. After completing his studies, he was invited to work in the Territorial Prelature of Chulucanas, in northwestern Peru, which held strong connections with the U.S. Augustinians.

Prevost is an expert in canon law, a system that functions like a constitution and legal system specifically for the Catholic Church, affording him appeal to the more traditional wings of the Vatican.

It remains to be seen how he will respond to the actions of U.S. President Donald Trump, who posted his congratulations on his social media platform Truth Social after the announcement that Prevost was Pope.

Prevost’s latest post on X was a repost of an account criticizing the Trump administration’s policy on immigrant deportations.

Robert Prevost has made history as the first American pope, elected as the 267th leader of the Catholic Church, taking the name Leo XIV. Born in Chicago and a cardinal-bishop, Prevost’s election was unexpected, as many had doubted an American would be chosen, especially after Pope Francis’s 12-year tenure. Prevost is known for his moderate leadership style and has been involved in significant reforms, including increasing female representation in bishop nominations.

Despite his accomplishments, Prevost’s past has raised concerns, particularly regarding his handling of sexual abuse cases and his conservative views on issues like the LGBT community. Critics have pointed to instances where he failed to adequately address allegations against priests during his tenure in various roles, including as Bishop of Chiclayo, Peru. His election has sparked discussions about the future direction of the Church, especially in light of his mixed record on progressive issues.

Prevost’s background includes extensive experience in canon law and a commitment to pastoral work, emphasizing the importance of serving the community. His election has garnered attention not only for its historical significance but also for the potential impact on the Church’s relationship with contemporary social issues, including immigration and gender identity. As he steps into this pivotal role, the global Catholic community watches closely to see how he will navigate these challenges.

Previous article

Title: Enhancing Equestrian Safety and Welfare: Insights from the 2025 FEI Sports Forum

As a member of the Fédération Equestre Internationale community, I try to constantly stay abreast of news and developments across the disciplines. The horse world seemed to be abuzz with important discussions at last month’s 2025 FEI Sports Forum in Lausanne, Switzerland, especially those concerning safety vests and horse welfare.

I was heartened to hear the debates at the forum. I particularly applaud the news that further investigations will be conducted into the use of safety vests and body protectors, in all their various forms. It’s a subject I feel strongly about.

A new working group has been established that “aims to enhance athlete safety by evaluating the effectiveness of equestrian safety vests and body protectors in reducing serious rider injuries and will identify necessary research to recommend optimal testing standards and future vest designs.”

While more information is always welcome, I think there’s already enough evidence to assert that currently available body protectors generally reduce both the chance and severity of injury to the upper torso during a fall.

The way these traditional back protectors work is easy to understand; studies have shown that their use decreased rib fractures in racing and fewer injuries occurred on cross-country, and personal experiences show that wearing a body protector does provide benefits. While there are some negatives to wearing a protective vest, such as the potential for heat buildup and cost, riders should be encouraged to use them based on their personal choices, risk profiles, and the equine activity they are engaging in.

In terms of air vests, we simply don’t have the hard data yet to say with certainty that they decrease the chance of injury. Hopefully, the new working group will be able to shed some more light on that, which may lead to new guidance for air jackets.

In the meantime, I believe the U.S. Equestrian Federation should encourage the use of protective vests in competition but not mandate it at this stage. I’m reminded of and encouraged by this passage in the USEF rules that explicitly allows competitors to use vests without being penalized:

“Body Protecting Vest. Any exhibitor may wear protective headgear and/or a protective vest, either body protecting or inflatable, specifically designed for use in equestrian sport in any division or class without penalty from the judge.”

This explicitly states that there should be no penalties or bonus points for wearing or not wearing a protective vest in competition. It’s worth remembering that this includes hunters and equitation competitors, too.

The other presentation at the Sports Forum, its 14th edition, that piqued my interest focused on a new 37-part Equine Welfare Action Plan to improve horse welfare. The FEI announced the establishment of an FEI Equine Welfare Advisory Group to promote a positive and collaborative approach to the use of horses in elite sport.

A member of the new group, the esteemed veterinarian Madeleine Campbell, said, “Our belief is that the use of horses in sport is ethical provided certain key principles are fulfilled. The guiding principles to which our group will be working will be to ensure that negative welfare effects are minimized, positive welfare effects are maximized, avoidable and unnecessary risks to horses are identified and mitigated, and the FEI regulations and the law are complied with.”

While this is a really positive and significant step in the right direction for horse sport, the program is missing a mandatory education program for the community. Unfortunately, there is no uniform consensus regarding training methods and horse care, as different disciplines, trainers, riders, drivers, countries and coaches have developed various training methods. Some are abusive and need to be stopped, some need clarification, and some are entirely consistent with horse welfare.

The equestrian community deserves to know exactly which training methods are appropriate and which, even if well-intentioned, are considered unacceptable. This requires teaching the community about the content of the Equine Welfare Action Plan. It is hard to prevent abuse in the first place or to support the development of best horse training practices without education. A mandatory equine welfare educational program, like the U.S. Center for SafeSport educational program, would be beneficial, as I have argued in the past.

We need to ensure that any casual observer of professional horse sports—someone flicking through channels on TV, for example—can clearly see that equine welfare is an absolute priority. It’s tough to admit that in the past, as an industry, we’ve been lacking in that area. However, educating our community about the public relations aspect of our sport will help maintain its popularity both in the public eye and its status on the Olympic roster.

Progress isn’t always easy, but it’s always worth it, especially when the issue at hand is horse welfare. Let’s keep it front and center so we can continue enjoying equestrian sports at the Olympics for many decades to come.

Armand Leone of Leone Equestrian Law LLC is a business professional with expertise in health care, equestrian sports and law. An equestrian athlete dedicated to fair play, safe sport and clean competition, Leone served as a director on the board of the U.S. Equestrian Federation and was USEF vice president of international high-performance programs for many years. He served on the USEF and U.S. Hunter Jumper Association special task forces on governance, safety, drugs and medications, trainer certification, and coach selection.

Leone is co-owner at his family’s Ri-Arm Farm in Oakland, New Jersey, where he still rides and trains. He competed in FEI World Cup Finals and Nations Cups. He is a graduate of the Columbia Business School in New York and the Columbia School of Law. He received his M.D. from New York Medical College and his B.A. from the University of Virginia.

Leone Equestrian Law LLC provides legal services and consultation for equestrian professionals. For more information, visit equestriancounsel.com or follow them on Facebook at facebook.com/leoneequestrianlaw.

The views expressed in opinion pieces are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Shop Indoor Riding Arena Lighting

latest articles

explore more