spot_img
Friday, June 6, 2025
HomeHorse Law NewsTitle: Fourth Circuit Ruling Puts 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports' Charters...

Title: Fourth Circuit Ruling Puts 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports’ Charters in Jeopardy

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled against 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports (FRM), denying their request for a preliminary injunction to operate as chartered teams in NASCAR. The teams had filed a lawsuit claiming that the sanctioning body violated antitrust laws by requiring them to release claims as a condition for participating in the Cup Series. Initially granted by a lower court, the injunction was overturned by the appellate judges, who found no legal basis for the teams’ claims.

As a result of the ruling, both teams face the possibility of losing their existing charters, which would force them to compete as open entries in upcoming races. While it’s unlikely that this would prevent their drivers from qualifying for races, it would significantly impact their financial standing, as chartered teams receive a larger share of purse and point fund money. The teams have 14 days to petition for a rehearing, but if they fail, they could be required to race without charters starting with the Atlanta race weekend.

In response to the ruling, 23XI and FRM expressed disappointment but remain optimistic about their case, which is set for trial in December. They aim to challenge what they view as anti-competitive practices in NASCAR and are committed to racing throughout the season while seeking a fairer economic system in the sport.

Source:
racer.com
Previous article
Next article

Title: "The Future of Horse Racing: Exploring Historical Betting at The Fairgrounds Race Course"

After 152 years of racing, the 153rd year of business at The Fairgrounds Race Course has been up in the air. The horse racing industry is trying to increase revenues by allowing bettors to gamble on past races that happened years ago. On its face, it may not make much sense. Loyola Law Professor Dane Ciolino joined WWL’s Dave Cohen to discuss the details and shed some light on the process.

The term for this type of gambling is “Historical Horse Racing” and essentially, bettors are given posted odds for past races, place a wager, then watch the old race hoping the horse they laid their money on wins. Those betting on the race are not given the names of the horses, jockeys, track conditions, or any identifying information. They basically choose horses based on the pre-race odds, then watch the historical race hoping for the best.

However, there are legal hurdles to be overcome. In 2021, the Louisiana Legislature passed an act that allowed for Historical Horse Racing and classified it as Paramutual Wagering, which is allowed in various parishes at live horse racing events. Paramutual Wagering is when lots of different bettors bet on horses in a given race. All their bets are pooled together, the house takes its cut, and the winnings are then split up among the bettors in the pool. Historical Horse Racing, however, was found to differ too much from Paramutual Wagering in the courts.

Ciolino notes the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that Historical Horse Racing resembles slot machines more so than live sports betting. That means for Historic Horse Racing to happen at the Fairgrounds, this would have to be passed by the State Legislature, signed by Governor Landry, then put on ballots for voters to decide on (often referred to as "the local option" in the voting process). It could be a cumbersome ordeal, but will be necessary moving forward in this newest fight for the Fairgrounds to remain viable.

Shop Indoor Riding Arena Lighting

latest articles

explore more