spot_img
Monday, May 5, 2025
HomeHorse Law NewsTitle: California's AB 1127: A Stealthy Assault on Legal Gun Ownership

Title: California’s AB 1127: A Stealthy Assault on Legal Gun Ownership

California lawmakers have advanced Assembly Bill 1127 (AB 1127), which aims to regulate the sale of semi-automatic handguns, particularly popular models like GLOCKs. The bill targets “machinegun-convertible pistols,” defined as any semi-automatic pistol with a cruciform trigger bar, effectively banning the sale of many widely owned firearms. Critics argue that the bill misplaces blame by focusing on legal gun owners and dealers rather than addressing the illegal conversion devices already prohibited under existing laws.

The legislation imposes harsh penalties on firearm dealers, including potential license revocation for multiple offenses, and expands the definition of a “machinegun” to encompass standard handguns that could theoretically be converted. This broad approach raises concerns among gun rights advocates, who fear it sets a precedent for further restrictions on firearms based on their potential misuse rather than actual criminal behavior.

Ultimately, AB 1127 is seen as part of a broader trend of anti-gun legislation that undermines Second Amendment rights under the guise of public safety. Critics argue that the bill will not effectively reduce crime but will instead harm lawful gun owners and retailers, limiting access to firearms that are legal in most other states.

Previous article

Title: Experts Warn Proposed Cycling Law Changes May Not Enhance Road Safety


Experts are warning they are "unlikely to improve road safety," with a previous attempt to bring in harsher sentences previously scrapped during the General Election.

Cycling law changes could prosecute dangerous riders who kill pedestrians. But experts are warning they are "unlikely to improve road safety," with a previous attempt to bring in harsher sentences previously scrapped during the General Election.

Labour Party government Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander aims to close a legal loophole which meant cyclists who killed or seriously injured pedestrians would be charged under a law intended for horse-drawn carriages from 1861.

Josh Hughes, Partner in the Complex Injury Team at Bolt Burdon Kemp, told GB News that it was "difficult to sustain" and said: "Where reckless cycling occurs, leading to death or serious injury, that person should not be treated unduly favourably by virtue of outdated laws."

"We are, however, talking about a tiny fraction of road traffic offences in comparison to conventional collisions between motorised vehicles and pedestrians where greater focus ought to lie."

"It remains the case that the overwhelming risk to vulnerable road users, as demonstrated by the UK’s road safety statistics, are speeding motorised vehicles."

A DfT spokesperson said: “Dangerous cycling is completely unacceptable, and the safety of our roads is a key priority for this Government.

“The Government is proposing new offences and penalties for dangerous cycling, updating legislation that is over 160 years old, to ensure that the tiny minority who recklessly disregard others face the full force of the law.

“These are being brought forward as part of the Crime and Policing Bill, and will be debated in due course.” Campaigners have welcomed the new legislation. Matt Briggs, whose wife, Kim, 44, was killed by a cyclist nine years ago, told the Telegraph: “After losing Kim in 2016, I began campaigning the following year to have these laws enacted.

“The use of the ‘wanton and furious’ charge for so many cases has been inadequate and archaic. I’m absolutely delighted that this Labour government has followed through with our calls for new legislation.

“This isn’t just a victory for me and my family, it’s also a victory for all the families who have worked tirelessly through their unbearable tragedies to have these laws changed.”

Shop Indoor Riding Arena Lighting

latest articles

explore more