spot_img
Friday, May 9, 2025
HomeHorse Law NewsTitle: "14 Bizarre American Laws Still on the Books: A Glimpse into...

Title: "14 Bizarre American Laws Still on the Books: A Glimpse into Legal Oddities"


Legal systems evolve slowly by design, with new laws continually added while outdated ones often remain on the books indefinitely. This legislative inertia has created a fascinating legal landscape filled with antiquated regulations that nobody enforces yet technically remain valid.

These forgotten statutes reflect bygone concerns, outdated social norms, and sometimes simply bizarre local priorities that somehow escaped legal housecleaning efforts. Here is a list of 14 peculiar American laws that remain technically in effect despite their obsolescence in modern society.

Tying Alligators to Fire Hydrants

In Michigan, it remains illegal to tie an alligator to a fire hydrant. This law likely originated when traveling circuses and exotic animal shows were common attractions in small towns across America. Local officials worried about public safety and access to critical infrastructure created these regulations to prevent show operators from securing their animals to essential public utilities. Nobody has likely been charged under this statute in decades, yet Michigan lawmakers have never bothered to remove it from the legal code.

Ice Cream in Back Pockets

In Kentucky, carrying ice cream in your back pocket is against the law. This strange regulation stems from the 1800s when horse thieves used ice cream to lure horses away without technically stealing them. The thief would put ice cream in their pocket, and when a horse followed them home attracted by the sweet treat, they could claim the animal had followed them home of its own accord. The law remains on the books despite the dramatic decline in both horse-based transportation and pocket-based horse theft schemes.

Playing Dominoes on Sunday

In Alabama, playing dominoes on Sunday is technically illegal in some municipalities. These regulations fall under old ‘blue laws’ designed to enforce religious observance and prevent certain activities deemed inappropriate for the Sabbath. While modern courts would likely find such laws unconstitutional if enforced, many communities have simply left them in place rather than going through formal repeal processes. Similar restrictions on Sunday activities exist throughout the country, creating a patchwork of unenforced religious-based regulations.

Whaling Prohibitions in Oklahoma

Oklahoma law prohibits whaling within state borders. This landlocked state is approximately 500 miles from the nearest ocean, making whale hunting physically impossible rather than merely illegal. The law likely exists either as a humorous addition to the legal code or because Oklahoma simply adopted wholesale legal frameworks from coastal states without removing irrelevant sections. Either way, Oklahoma’s whale population can rest easy knowing they’re legally protected in the unlikely event they find themselves in the Sooner State.

Fortune-Telling Licenses

In New Orleans, professional fortune tellers must obtain licenses and pay fees to legally practice their craft. This regulation dates back to efforts to control what authorities considered potentially fraudulent activities while still accommodating the city’s unique cultural practices. Unlike many outdated laws, this one occasionally sees enforcement, particularly in tourist areas where unlicensed psychics set up shop. The regulation creates the curious situation where the government officially licenses people to predict the future, implicitly giving state sanction to supernatural claims.

Frowning in Public

In Pocatello, Idaho, a 1948 ordinance made it illegal to display a ‘dismal or depressed countenance’ in public. The ‘smile ordinance’ was originally passed as a humorous morale booster during a particularly harsh winter. Local police never actively enforced the regulation, but the city gained national attention in 1987 when the law was discovered by media outlets. Rather than repealing it, city officials turned it into a marketing opportunity, reaffirming Pocatello as the ‘U.S. Smile Capital’ and maintaining this quirky legal footnote for tourism purposes.

Flirting Fines

In New York City, a man can be fined $25 for ‘gazing suggestively’ at a female passerby. This regulation comes from early 20th-century efforts to combat street harassment and maintain public decorum. The subjective nature of determining what constitutes a ‘suggestive gaze’ makes this law practically unenforceable in modern times. Nevertheless, it persists in the city’s legal code alongside other outdated public conduct regulations that reflect changing social standards across generations.

No Selling Peanuts After Sundown

In Mobile, Alabama, selling peanuts after sundown is prohibited on certain streets. This obscure regulation likely originated from early 20th-century concerns about litter and public nuisance, as peanut shells were commonly discarded on streets and sidewalks. Nighttime visibility made the shells particularly hazardous to pedestrians in the era before widespread street lighting. Though modern street cleaning and lighting have rendered this concern obsolete, the law remains a curious relic of municipal micromanagement.

Mining with Dynamite on Sundays

A Nevada state law prohibits using dynamite while mining on Sundays. This regulation combines elements of blue laws with legitimate safety concerns from an era when mining dominated the state’s economy. With fewer mine inspectors available on Sundays, lawmakers likely saw the prohibition as a practical safety measure rather than a purely religious regulation. Modern mining operations follow comprehensive federal safety guidelines, making this state-level Sunday restriction redundant yet still technically enforceable.

No Playing Checkers in Public

In Fountain Inn, South Carolina, playing checkers in public remains against local ordinances. This law originated during segregation when authorities sought to prevent interracial socialization in public spaces. Checker games were popular gathering activities that brought people together across racial lines, prompting discriminatory regulations to prohibit them. While the discriminatory intent behind the law would make it unconstitutional today, the actual statute remains in municipal code, an uncomfortable reminder of the legal infrastructure of racial segregation.

Mispronouncing State Names

In Arkansas, mispronouncing the state name is technically a legal violation. The state legislature passed this tongue-in-cheek law in 1947 to address the common mispronunciation of ‘Ar-kansas’ instead of the correct ‘Arkansaw.’ The statute specifically approves only the latter pronunciation while making no provision for actual penalties. Despite being entirely unenforceable and likely unconstitutional under First Amendment protections, the law reflects regional pride in linguistic distinctiveness that lawmakers felt worth preserving in legal code.

Elephant Parking Meters

Cleveland, Ohio maintains a regulation requiring motorists who park elephants at parking meters to deposit an appropriate payment just as they would for automobiles. This peculiar law emerged during an era when traveling circuses regularly visited American cities and sometimes left performing animals in inconvenient locations. The statute applies standard parking regulations to unusual conveyances without creating separate rules, demonstrating an oddly practical approach to an improbable situation. The law remains despite the declining presence of elephants in urban transportation.

Sleeping in Cheese Factories

In South Dakota, falling asleep in a cheese factory violates state law. This regulation likely originated from genuine safety concerns about industrial accidents and sanitation in food production facilities. Workers who doze off near dangerous equipment or in sensitive production areas could cause serious problems. While modern food safety regulations and OSHA standards cover these concerns more comprehensively, the specific prohibition against cheese factory napping remains on the books as a curious artifact of early food safety legislation.

No Riding Horses After Dark

In Wilbur, Washington, riding a horse after dark requires tail lights and reflectors, treating equine transportation similarly to motorized vehicles. This law emerged during the transition period between horse-based and automobile transportation, attempting to apply consistent safety standards across different modes of travel. Similar horse lighting regulations exist in several states, creating the legally peculiar situation where animals must be equipped with technology designed for machines. These requirements persist despite the minimal presence of horse-based night transportation in contemporary America.

These forgotten laws reveal how legal systems accumulate cultural artifacts that reflect changing technologies, social values, and public concerns across generations. While technically enforceable, these regulations survive primarily as historical curiosities rather than active governance tools. The continued existence of these outdated statutes demonstrates how legal systems prioritize adding new laws over removing obsolete ones, creating a fascinating archaeological record embedded within active legal codes. Next time you carry ice cream in your pocket or frown in Idaho, remember you might be breaking laws nobody remembers but everyone technically must follow.

Legal systems often retain outdated laws, creating a landscape filled with peculiar regulations that, while technically enforceable, are rarely applied. These antiquated statutes reflect historical concerns and social norms that have long since evolved, resulting in a collection of bizarre laws that remain on the books across various states.

Examples include Michigan’s law against tying alligators to fire hydrants, Kentucky’s prohibition on carrying ice cream in back pockets, and Alabama’s ban on playing dominoes on Sundays. These laws often originated from specific historical contexts, such as public safety or social order, but have become irrelevant in modern society.

Ultimately, these forgotten laws serve as cultural artifacts, highlighting the legislative inertia that prioritizes the addition of new laws over the removal of outdated ones. They remind us of the quirky intersections between legal frameworks and societal changes, illustrating how legal codes can preserve remnants of the past.

Previous article

Title: New York Officials Negotiate $5 Million Tax Break for Racetracks Amid Budget Discussions

Top New York officials are negotiating a $5 million tax break for racetracks across the state as part of a massive spending plan that appears to be having its final touches put together in Albany.

The plan being pushed by the New York Racing Association would raise the pari-mutuel tax rate on advance deposit wagering operators and lower the rate on Thoroughbred and Standardbred racetracks.

The proposal is a change from what New York Gov. Kathy Hochul proposed in January, which was, in essence, a revenue-neutral set of alterations to the complex pari-mutuel tax laws.

Negotiators for Hochul and the Legislature are still putting the final pieces together on a new budget for the state, which was due on April 1 when the fiscal year began. Until all the various budget bills emerge and get voted on, the pari-mutuel proposed language could still change.

The final budget, as previously reported, is expected to include language to round bettors’ winnings to the nearest penny for all horse race payouts now affected by the state’s breakage law.

As the BloodHorse reported in March, the final budget is also expected to set aside funding for equipping and operating a new advanced imaging screen program at the Cornell Ruffian Equine Specialists Hospital adjacent to Belmont Park.

Under the pari-mutuel tax proposal being discussed, out-of-state ADWs would pay a tax rate of 6.45% of handle, up from 5% currently. NYRA now pays 7.45% of handle to the state, which would drop by 0.54% under the new plan being negotiated behind closed doors at the state capitol. Sources said the numbers being discussed would still see ADWs paying a lower tax on handle than the 6.91% level for NYRA.

It is uncertain how much of the $5 million in tax breaks would benefit NYRA specifically compared to other track operators in the state. Officials with the heads of the Senate and Assembly racing and wagering committees did not comment Tuesday.

For NYRA, the uniform pari-mutuel tax rate would result in a savings of 0.54%. Even with this change, NYRA would still have an overall effective statutorily imposed rate of 6.91% of handle.

Backers of the proposal say the changes are needed.

"The proposed changes to New York State’s pari-mutuel taxes and fees will simplify the horse racing business and level the playing field between New York’s racetracks/ADW operators and their out-of-state competitors. NYRA commends Governor Hochul and the NYS Legislature for supporting a more consistent payment structure across the racing landscape, which will allow organizations like NYRA to maximize its investments in the sport and its stakeholders," NYRA spokesman Patrick McKenna said on May 6.

Next article

Title: Enhancing Equestrian Safety and Welfare: Insights from the 2025 FEI Sports Forum

As a member of the Fédération Equestre Internationale community, I try to constantly stay abreast of news and developments across the disciplines. The horse world seemed to be abuzz with important discussions at last month’s 2025 FEI Sports Forum in Lausanne, Switzerland, especially those concerning safety vests and horse welfare.

I was heartened to hear the debates at the forum. I particularly applaud the news that further investigations will be conducted into the use of safety vests and body protectors, in all their various forms. It’s a subject I feel strongly about.

A new working group has been established that “aims to enhance athlete safety by evaluating the effectiveness of equestrian safety vests and body protectors in reducing serious rider injuries and will identify necessary research to recommend optimal testing standards and future vest designs.”

While more information is always welcome, I think there’s already enough evidence to assert that currently available body protectors generally reduce both the chance and severity of injury to the upper torso during a fall.

The way these traditional back protectors work is easy to understand; studies have shown that their use decreased rib fractures in racing and fewer injuries occurred on cross-country, and personal experiences show that wearing a body protector does provide benefits. While there are some negatives to wearing a protective vest, such as the potential for heat buildup and cost, riders should be encouraged to use them based on their personal choices, risk profiles, and the equine activity they are engaging in.

In terms of air vests, we simply don’t have the hard data yet to say with certainty that they decrease the chance of injury. Hopefully, the new working group will be able to shed some more light on that, which may lead to new guidance for air jackets.

In the meantime, I believe the U.S. Equestrian Federation should encourage the use of protective vests in competition but not mandate it at this stage. I’m reminded of and encouraged by this passage in the USEF rules that explicitly allows competitors to use vests without being penalized:

“Body Protecting Vest. Any exhibitor may wear protective headgear and/or a protective vest, either body protecting or inflatable, specifically designed for use in equestrian sport in any division or class without penalty from the judge.”

This explicitly states that there should be no penalties or bonus points for wearing or not wearing a protective vest in competition. It’s worth remembering that this includes hunters and equitation competitors, too.

The other presentation at the Sports Forum, its 14th edition, that piqued my interest focused on a new 37-part Equine Welfare Action Plan to improve horse welfare. The FEI announced the establishment of an FEI Equine Welfare Advisory Group to promote a positive and collaborative approach to the use of horses in elite sport.

A member of the new group, the esteemed veterinarian Madeleine Campbell, said, “Our belief is that the use of horses in sport is ethical provided certain key principles are fulfilled. The guiding principles to which our group will be working will be to ensure that negative welfare effects are minimized, positive welfare effects are maximized, avoidable and unnecessary risks to horses are identified and mitigated, and the FEI regulations and the law are complied with.”

While this is a really positive and significant step in the right direction for horse sport, the program is missing a mandatory education program for the community. Unfortunately, there is no uniform consensus regarding training methods and horse care, as different disciplines, trainers, riders, drivers, countries and coaches have developed various training methods. Some are abusive and need to be stopped, some need clarification, and some are entirely consistent with horse welfare.

The equestrian community deserves to know exactly which training methods are appropriate and which, even if well-intentioned, are considered unacceptable. This requires teaching the community about the content of the Equine Welfare Action Plan. It is hard to prevent abuse in the first place or to support the development of best horse training practices without education. A mandatory equine welfare educational program, like the U.S. Center for SafeSport educational program, would be beneficial, as I have argued in the past.

We need to ensure that any casual observer of professional horse sports—someone flicking through channels on TV, for example—can clearly see that equine welfare is an absolute priority. It’s tough to admit that in the past, as an industry, we’ve been lacking in that area. However, educating our community about the public relations aspect of our sport will help maintain its popularity both in the public eye and its status on the Olympic roster.

Progress isn’t always easy, but it’s always worth it, especially when the issue at hand is horse welfare. Let’s keep it front and center so we can continue enjoying equestrian sports at the Olympics for many decades to come.

Armand Leone of Leone Equestrian Law LLC is a business professional with expertise in health care, equestrian sports and law. An equestrian athlete dedicated to fair play, safe sport and clean competition, Leone served as a director on the board of the U.S. Equestrian Federation and was USEF vice president of international high-performance programs for many years. He served on the USEF and U.S. Hunter Jumper Association special task forces on governance, safety, drugs and medications, trainer certification, and coach selection.

Leone is co-owner at his family’s Ri-Arm Farm in Oakland, New Jersey, where he still rides and trains. He competed in FEI World Cup Finals and Nations Cups. He is a graduate of the Columbia Business School in New York and the Columbia School of Law. He received his M.D. from New York Medical College and his B.A. from the University of Virginia.

Leone Equestrian Law LLC provides legal services and consultation for equestrian professionals. For more information, visit equestriancounsel.com or follow them on Facebook at facebook.com/leoneequestrianlaw.

The views expressed in opinion pieces are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Shop Indoor Riding Arena Lighting

latest articles

explore more