The article reflects on the fallout from the Andrew McConnon horse abuse case, highlighting the disappointment and anger felt within the eventing community over such incidents occurring in a sport that values the partnership between horse and rider. The author emphasizes concerns about the treatment of female FEI witnesses, many of whom were in vulnerable positions and faced significant professional risks by coming forward. The article critiques the tribunal’s focus on inconsistencies and alleged collaboration among witnesses, arguing that such scrutiny may unfairly discredit genuine testimonies, especially given the challenges of gathering concrete evidence in environments where abuse may be hidden or difficult to document.

The author calls for more robust, fair, and holistic reporting and investigative systems that prioritize horse welfare and protect those advocating for horses. Suggestions include anonymous reporting options, equal weight for verbal and written statements, and involvement of professionals who can assess horses’ trauma. The piece stresses the need for transparent, thorough handling of abuse cases without leniency, regardless of the accused’s status, and expresses hope that the eventing community and governing bodies will commit to meaningful change to ensure horse protection remains paramount.