Lindsey Halligan, the prosecutor in the James Comey case, is facing significant legal challenges as multiple pretrial dismissal avenues emerge. After a difficult hearing, Halligan publicly criticized the presiding judge, Michael Nachmanoff, for allegedly calling her a “puppet.” However, the judge had only posed a legal question to Comey’s defense about whether Halligan was acting as a “puppet” or “stalking horse” for former President Trump, a term relevant to claims of unconstitutional vindictiveness in the prosecution. Halligan’s public response mischaracterized the judge’s inquiry as a personal attack, despite the question being a standard legal consideration.

Halligan’s difficulties are compounded by her lack of prosecutorial experience and ongoing scrutiny over her appointment’s legality, which could further jeopardize the case. Additionally, she faces ethical inquiries, including a bar complaint related to inappropriate communications with the media. Overall, Halligan’s public statements appear to be an attempt to defend a faltering case, but both her legal and professional standing remain precarious as the case against Comey and related legal issues continue to unfold.