The article examines the controversial FEI tribunal case involving US eventing rider Andrew McConnon, who was suspended for 20 months for horse abuse, a penalty many in the equestrian community viewed as lenient. Despite multiple allegations and witness testimonies spanning years, the tribunal found insufficient evidence of long-term abuse and sanctioned McConnon only for three incidents he admitted to, attributing his behavior to personal stress. The case contrasts sharply with that of Cesar Parra, who received a 15-year ban based on extensive video evidence and witness accounts. The article highlights the challenges the FEI faces in prosecuting out-of-competition abuse, given limited investigative powers and reliance on often ambiguous witness testimony and scarce video evidence.

The author argues that the current FEI disciplinary process is flawed, as it attempts to apply a legal-style procedure within a sporting regulatory framework that lacks resources and authority to thoroughly investigate abuse allegations. The article calls for a reformed, unified approach to welfare and abuse regulations across all equestrian disciplines and suggests that national federations may need to take on more responsibility for handling such cases. It also provides guidance on how to report horse abuse effectively, emphasizing the importance of detailed, contemporaneous evidence and witness cooperation.