Act Party leader David Seymour faces significant opposition in New Zealand, with his proposed Regulatory Standards Bill stirring controversy despite its relatively modest impact. The bill aims to introduce classical liberal principles into the regulatory process by requiring government departments to assess proposed laws against these principles and establishing an independent board to review these assessments. However, it does not create legal rights or obligations, nor does it allow courts to challenge non-compliant regulations. Instead, it adds a layer of scrutiny and bureaucracy, compelling ministers to publicly justify regulations that deviate from the principles.

While the bill reflects classical liberal values foundational to New Zealand’s political economy, it lacks cross-party support and has been criticized for not incorporating broader perspectives such as Treaty of Waitangi recognition or collective wellbeing. Critics question the bill’s practical purpose, given it would likely be repealed by opposition parties if Act and National lose power. Ultimately, the bill is seen as a symbolic “gadfly”—short-lived and limited in effect—but potentially capable of influencing regulatory standards during its brief existence.